{"id":65878,"date":"2019-09-23T09:28:55","date_gmt":"2019-09-23T08:28:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.archea.it\/area-166-re-use\/"},"modified":"2025-12-15T17:18:01","modified_gmt":"2025-12-15T16:18:01","slug":"area-166-re-use","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/area-166-re-use\/","title":{"rendered":"area 166 | re-use"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">International magazine of architecture and project design september<\/span><span class=\"s1\">\/october\u00a0 2019<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Re-use<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It is always useful to study the etymology and meaning of the words we use so that the custom of the language can also <\/span><span class=\"s1\">find, in the simple re-reading of the dictionary, the verification of terms that we pronounce daily in the exercise of the <\/span><span class=\"s1\">profession of architect. Many of these, for example \u201cReuse\u201c, are the result of a literary design activity since they stem <\/span><span class=\"s1\">from the \u201ccomposition\u201c of terms or words, in this specific case from the suffix re &#8211; \u201cagain\u201c and the verb \u201cto use\u201c, capable <\/span><span class=\"s1\">of revealing a behaviour or an activity, specifically: new, further use; recovery, reuse. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">Recover, rebuild, recycle, readjust, disassemble and reassemble are common architectural practices linked to a profound <\/span><span class=\"s1\">and popular intelligence \u2013 especially in Italy \u2013 an ancient knowledge that escapes the logic of pure consumption by <\/span><span class=\"s1\">introducing into the project, and therefore into the city, the theme of duration, duration, transformation, regeneration, and <\/span><span class=\"s1\">respect for available resources. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">Topics once brought to light by the lack of available resources and today necessary, on the contrary, due to the <\/span><span class=\"s1\">overabundance of means and tools, consume the environment, the soil, the air and the climate with frightening rapidity. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">Paradoxically, we are forced to become aware of the fact that it is not only poverty and the lack of available means that <\/span><span class=\"s1\">we have to deal with, but in particular of that behavioural bulimia resulting from the disproportionate availability of oil <\/span><span class=\"s1\">and its infinite and damaging derivatives, of the excessive quantity of waste, and, in our specific field, from an ability <\/span><span class=\"s1\">to build unprecedented in history. Fortunately, the debate and awareness on the subject are longstanding issues, as <\/span><span class=\"s1\">shown by many urban political choices that in the most developed areas of the planet discourage or even prohibit new <\/span><span class=\"s1\">buildings in favour of the recovery of the existing building heritage, urban regeneration, functional transformation, even <\/span><span class=\"s1\">the \u201cintrospective growth\u201c that has its fulcrum in the \u201czero volume\u201c master plans, in other words, incompatible with further <\/span><span class=\"s1\">expansive theories. In the past, as recalled by Alessandro Massarente in his essay published in the pages to come, <\/span><span class=\"s1\">there are interesting analogies and convincing experiments of Re-use, disassembly and reassembly of parts of buildings <\/span><span class=\"s1\">in other buildings following interventions, almost always motivated by lack of funding. Today, however, this practice is <\/span><span class=\"s1\">indispensable since the scarce resource is not of an economical nature, but nature itself understood as environmental <\/span><span class=\"s1\">balance and availability of land. Building onto pre-existing constructions is therefore a necessity beyond a trend that <\/span><span class=\"s1\">introduces the theme of ethics in urban planning and in the construction sector, an operating condition that consequently <\/span><span class=\"s1\">influences the debate and reflections on the architectural project as a discipline, which at this point must consider as a <\/span><span class=\"s1\">starting point not only the land, but pre-existing elements, an art that has already, according to Morris, embraced all <\/span><span class=\"s1\">the modifications of the earth\u2018s crust except the pure desert and that now must measure up to what has already been <\/span><span class=\"s1\">modified and built over the centuries. It is quite clear that intervening on existing elements involves a careful interpretation of the urban facts (to cite Aldo Rossi) and of the context, but to which we must add the attentive evaluation of the original artifact to be modified. In other words, it is a matter of changing the regulatory boundaries and understanding that recovery and project restoration have become synonyms and absolutely overlapping fields. For years, the magazine has strived to promote research and studies in this direction ever since June 1997 (Area 32) with the first monographic issue. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">Today our distinctive trait is dedicated to the theme of restoration or better, the relationship, in architecture, between the <\/span><span class=\"s1\">new and the existing. Since then, I recall from our bibliography, the issue on the reuse of ancient elements (Area 45), <\/span><span class=\"s1\">the in-depth studies on the addition and transformation of historic and modern buildings (Area 148) up to the interesting <\/span><span class=\"s1\">interventions on marginal, or interstitial areas of increasingly complex post-industrial cities to control and administrate. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">The modifications (Area 91) of the building heritage also involve a serious political and legislative programme both <\/span><span class=\"s1\">at national and local levels, aimed at safeguarding the territory and recovering and transforming existing buildings, <\/span><span class=\"s1\">whether they are industrial or residential. This insistence towards a cultural and therefore editorial direction of the <\/span><span class=\"s1\">magazine, confirms the awareness that a decisive action of an improvement of the building heritage can offer substantial <\/span><span class=\"s1\">advantages: reduction, first and foremost, of land consumption, reduction of costs for infrastructures and mobility, <\/span><span class=\"s1\">densification of urban contexts, such as improvements in the quality of life and less environmental pollution. Fortunately, <\/span><span class=\"s1\">the majority of protagonists of the architectural debate and of public or private institutions are moving in this direction, as <\/span><span class=\"s1\">shown by the success of the Grand Parc Bordeaux project by the French firm Lacaton &amp; Vassal at the Mies van der Rohe Award 2019. This is an interesting intervention for the redevelopment of housing on a popular building constructed in the Sixties where the element added to the fa\u00e7ade has the function of both implementing the surface of the single units and decreasing the thermal dispersion of the building. It is not a new building, it is not a coincidence, but a precise choice <\/span><span class=\"s1\">that we feel we can support and encourage.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Laura Andreini<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.archea.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/cover-166.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Download cover<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.archea.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/SOMMARIO-166.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Download table of contents<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.archea.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/present-166-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Download introduction of Laura Andreini<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>International magazine of architecture and project design september\/october\u00a0 2019 Re-use It is always useful to study the etymology and meaning of the words we use so that the custom of the language can also find, in the simple re-reading of the dictionary, the verification of terms that we pronounce daily in the exercise of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":65870,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[958,1798],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-critical-lectures","category-editorial"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65878"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65878\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80909,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65878\/revisions\/80909"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.archea.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}